Administrative Inequality

Administrative Inequality: The Case of Foreign Nationals in Germany (AdmIn)

Project description

Aims and central research questions
Foreign nationals face a considerable risk of both negative and positive discrimination when they are applying for visa, work permits, asylum or passports. The AdmIn project examines the unequal decisions of German administrators and judges with regard to naturalization and visa applications and how the perceived inequities influence the behaviour of the potential applicants. The key objective is to offer systematic assessment of administrative decision-making discrimination towards foreign nationals with a limited set of outside options. To this end, AdmIn will develop and test a new unifying model of administrative leeway with the help of original administrative and interview data.

Background
It is well established that asylum seekers are treated differently across the European Union and its member states. The potential administrative discrimination that foreign nationals experience when filing visa applications or naturalization requests have not yet been frequently explored. The project will test, based on sound legal reasoning and an encompassing model, whether the inequities can be traced back to what is known as taste-based or statistical discrimination. While the former behavior reflects the prejudice of the decision maker, the latter form of discrimination arises when bureaucrats and judges do not possess sufficient information to assess a file. Since the direct observation of discriminatory behavior is not possible in this domain, the AdmIn project will resort to indirect strategies to estimate the size of both positive and negative discrimination of different groups of foreign nationals. 

Methods

  • Game theory
  • Webscraping and automated content analysis
  • Legal reasoning
  • Interviews
  • Econometrics

Disciplines
Politics and Public Administration, Public Law

Starting date
October 2020

Project Partner

Moritz Baumgärtel (Utrecht University)

Learn more about Moritz Baumgärtel

Dominik Hangartner (ETH Zürich / London School of Economics and Political Science)

Learn more about Dominik Hangartner

Eiko Thielemann (London School of Economics and Political Science)

Learn more about Eiko Thielemann

Maarten Vink (Maastricht University)

Learn more about Maarten Vink

Natascha Zaun (London School of Economics and Political Science)

Learn more about Natascha Zaun

Literatur

Publications and Working Papers

Gundacker, Lidwina, Yuliya Kosyakova, and Gerald Schneider. 2024. “How Regional Attitudes towards Immigration Shape the Chance to Obtain Asylum: Evidence from Germany.” Migration Studies, March, mnae002. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnae002.

Kosyakova, Yuliya, Lidwina Gundacker, and Gerald Schneider. 2024. “How Regional Attitudes towards Immigration Shape the Chance to Obtain Asylum: Evidence from Germany.” OSF. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/XTM2A.

Rueß, Stefanie, Gerald Schneider, and Jan Vogler. 2024. “Priming and Prejudice: Experimental Evidence on Negative News Frames and Discrimination in German Welfare Offices.” Working Paper No. 34. Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality”. https://doi.org/10.48787/kops/352-2-22clx2a9ywg42.

Aden, Samia, Jana Mayer, and Gerald Schneider. 2023. “Asylpolitik.” In Flucht- und Flüchtlingsforschung: Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Studium, edited by Tabea Scharrer, Birgit Glorius, J. Olaf Kleist, and Marcel Berlinghoff, 1. Auflage, 481–88. NomosHandbuch. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

Froese, Judith, and Daniel Thym. 2022. Grundgesetz und Rassismus. Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG. https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-161737-9.

Schneider, Gerald. 2021. “Vertrauen ist gut, Replikation ist besser : Für eine evidenzbasierte Asylpolitik : Replik Auf Ursula Gräfin Praschma.” Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik (ZAR) 41 (1): 10–14.

Gundacker, Lidwina, Yuliya Kosyakova, and Gerald Schneider. 2021. “Global Norms, Regional Practices : Taste-Based and Statistical Discrimination in German Asylum Decision-Making.” Working Paper No. 05. Cluster of Excellence “The Politics of Inequality.” https://hdl.handle.net/10419/240322.

Thym, Daniel. 2020. “Supranational Courts in Europe: A Moderately Communitarian Turn in the Case Law on Immigration and Citizenship.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 47 (April):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1750353.

Outreach

Fluchtforschungsblog: "Fakten statt Meinungen: für eine evidenzbasierte Asylpolitik" - Gerald Schneider (2021)